We try to understand what "Wikileaks" (from leaks, "loss", "escape [news]" in English) is a website run by a group of hackers known as "International Subversives" (subversive International) which report to Julian Assange hackers from Australia, which hangs from a November 2010 arrest warrant issued by the International Court of Stockholm, which involved Interpol, the European Union via the Schengen Information System (the accusation by two women, alleged rape, harassment, coercion and illegal, "ludicrous accusations" in comparison to the thousands of breaches to computer systems of government agencies, ministries, public and private companies, etc ....), but this certainly is a way to be able to locate and create scorched earth around him, as for many years in hiding.
We return to Wikileaks, it is an international group that collects anonymously and through a network of informants and hackers with illegal procedures documents covered by "Secret - Classified - Confidence", which then inserts thoughtlessly and without regard for consequences that may result the network via their website. Wikileaks.
The group is well aware of the importance of documents as dealing with material that will later verify the authenticity of the public on its servers located in Belgium and Sweden (two countries with laws that protect such assets) that allows you to protect the anonymity of informants and suits those people involved in the "flight or theft of information."
The goals of Julian Assange and his group is that of transparency by governments as a guarantee of justice, ethics, a stronger democracy, but this is in contrast with the National Security States that are seen publicly published "Secrets and Confidential "that may endanger both the delicate diplomatic relations between some states, but also the lives of men working in the field.
But my question is can a person like Julian Assange can continue to move freely for Europe, giving interviews and no one can stop him? I wonder who really is Julian Assange an advocate of "freedom of information" or an agent provocateur protected by some foreign power?
The site and servers up to November 2010 he used a modified version of MediaWiki software, but before the publication of new documents (about 60,000 files), Julian Assange and administrators Wikileaks have completely changed the structure of the site leaving the MediaWiki software, relying on a new system with a very sophisticated level of security, which in some environments have theorized Intelligence of Chinese origin.
Some governments have unleashed in the days untimi men Julian Assange intelligence to track and neutralize the organization Wikileaks and the network
The Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov has threatened to destroy Wikileaks.
Other governments have revived the "DA-Notice or Defence Advisory Notice" is a formal request for you editors do not advertise, publish or broadcast items on specified subjects, for reasons of national security. The system is still in use in many European countries including Britain, France and Germany but also in Australia, the U.S. and other governments.
Practically in those governments where there is a strong sense of the state, the institutions of the country and the press agrees to pursue the protection of institutional guarantees, of course this is not conceivable to our country, the leftist press and all the left accuse the government of trying muzzle of "press freedom" even if the information published may endanger our soldiers engaged in missions abroad, personal services and the government and diplomatic relations and treaties with other governments.
But most have issued a directive called "special cause for justification" that authorizes the Secret Service functions to operate in other states to find and neutralize "Julian Assange and destroy his organization, now considered on par with" terrorists " hiding behind the principle of "press freedom" in reality with their publications seeking to destabilize some countries and governments (through the protection and complicity of some state).
Obama The Clinton Administration has underestimated the "loss" of these documents, apart from the fact that a reading is not exactly a formula outlined in line with the dialectic diplomatic and intelligence.
But we come to Italy, the revelations of Wikileaks on the first group of documents include the Berlusconi government and the concerns of the US's relations with the Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, going so far as to speculate about an alleged bribe jobs and contracts between Eni in Moscow with Russia's Gazprom.
The information seems more a collection of newspaper clippings and gossip bar and beauty salon.
Being Italian citizen, information on Italy and Prime Minister Berlusconi seem designed to influence Italian politics to drop the Italian Government, perhaps the American administration has felt bypassed by the foreign policy of our government and even if the 'Italy is always been a loyal and valuable ally it was decided to defame the President of the Council by the staff of the American Embassy in Italy, providing distorted information on this to advise Clinton to replace the entire staff, because the information was not objective, it also to give proof that his words spoken on the relationship of esteem and friendship with the Italian Government are not just for the occasion.
Obvious that the Italian left, even the party "Anti Berlusconi," they took advantage, with parliamentary questions because the Prime Minister goes to the rooms and to report with confidence in the Government.
But the most ridiculous thing is the request of D'Alema, President of Copasir, which claims that Prime Minister Berlusconi goes to report to Services Committee, but in my opinion would be the Copasir body responsible for ensuring the security of the Prime Minister and the nation having to explain why those were not taken all measures to guarantee the security of the country, the Government and the Prime Minister, allowing the disclosure of the U.S., but have not even bothered to tackle the job of the American intelligence services, they are one of the tasks of Copasir, but maybe D'Alema at the time he was distracted thinking about how to bring down the government.
Pending release additional information as "confidential and secret" by Julian Assange, which cover the period where Prodi was Prime Minister, I would like especially to members of the PD and the Honourable Franceschini which is always the question about Mitrokhin dossier in that case was a true "act of treason" against Italy.
But what I still do not understand is how can a nation like the U.S. (I've always felt a little American / Israeli) with dozens of intelligence agencies, Homeland Security and Counter-Espionage has succeeded in becoming a "steal" thousands of documents reserved, without realizing it.
This is my opinion, I would not want that this operation had been orchestrated by rivals of the Obama administration, someone who has served Bradley Manning (mentally unstable) to pass information to Wikileaks by Julian Assange, although I believe such ridiculous circumstances and justification possible that none of his fellow soldiers became aware of the stealing and maybe of any unauthorized access to the system?
Who really is the director? Who is behind this operation of espionage? The only sure thing in light of what's happening out that the Obama administration or discredited, inefficient on important issues such as his own safety, and to foreign policy, which is creating rifts between the allies and a sense of distrust reliability of the U.S. State Department and the Administration itself. (The fear that they may be published agreements that really could create tensions and threaten the national security of the Allies.)
It has created a situation that if it were to be considered "grave and serious" could be seen as a parody of the series "Police Academy", but instead we are in reality and it is inconceivable how a power like the American one has not noticed that was happening at the point of being in a very embarrassing situation.
Dr. Roberto Polastro
No comments:
Post a Comment