France’s military intervention in the campaign underway in
However, France ’s action in Mali was a catalyst for the deadly terrorist
attack on the Ain Amenas gas plant in southern Algeria . The
modus operandi chosen by the terrorists deviated from the organization's
familiar repertoire, which specialized in criminal activity and kidnapping
Western citizens and demanding ransom for their release. This frontal attack on
a sensitive and explosive gas plant, in which more than thirty men armed with
numerous weapons, explosives, and explosive belts took hundreds of hostages,
intended to achieve a number of objectives. First, it challenged the sovereignty
of the Algerian government and dealt a serious blow to a major industry that is
important to the national revenue. Second, it presented a complex security
challenge to the Algerian government’s counterterrorism policy against al-Qaeda
in the Maghreb . Third, it was an attempt to
prevent active support by Algeria or the participation of
Algerian soldiers alongside the foreign African and Western troops fighting with
the weak Malian army to remove global jihadist elements from the north of the
country. Fourth, the kidnapping of many foreign hostages was designed both to
acquire bargaining chips and deter the Western countries whose citizens were
being held hostage from supporting the French action and the Malian
army.
The Algerian government, loyal to
its tough policy in the war on terror, rejected the demands to release
terrorists imprisoned in Algeria . After four days, it ended
the incident with two waves of attack by special forces. The result was the
death of the attackers (who apparently numbered between thirty-two and forty)
and several dozen hostages, including at least some two dozen foreign nationals,
out of hundreds of hostages who were in the plant during the attack.[1]
While the Algerian affair has
reached its operational end, the local military effort in Mali continues,
supported by some two thousand French soldiers and an aerial force, with the
goal of removing global jihadist elements from the north of the country.
Following the French action and on the basis of an emergency meeting of the
Economic Community of West African States that took place recently in the Ivory
Coast, African states, including Nigeria and Togo – whose vanguard forces have
already arrived in Mali – as well as Chad, Senegal, Niger, Burkina Faso, Ghana,
and Guinea, have promised to send soldiers to help the Malian army. In northern
Mali they face a coalition of three
Salafist jihadi organizations, including Ansar al-Din, the Movement for Oneness
and Jihad in West Africa (MOJWA), and elements from al-Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb. Ansar al-Din was established in late 2011 by a Tuareg mercenary who left the
NMLA (the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad) because of differences
with the separatist movement’s senior leadership and their lack of response to
his desire to receive a leadership position. Several hundred Tuareg fighters who
earned much experience in terrorism and guerilla fighting in the war in
Libya have joined his organization.
Ansar al-Din has a large number of sophisticated weapons that were captured or
bought from Qaddafi’s arsenal. The group has adopted the Salafist jihadist
approach and has worked to impose sharia law in the north of
Mali with the goal of impose it in
other parts of the country as well. Working alongside this group are members of
MOJWA, which was established in January 2012 by natives of Africa who also left
al-Qaeda in the Maghreb due to internal
sectarian disputes and who share the same world view. Members of al-Qaeda in the
Maghreb, who fled Algeria because of pressure from
Algerian security forces, have joined in operations.
In spite of intervention by
France and its allies, it
appears that the campaign to liberate Mali from global jihadist elements is
just beginning. The attempt to remove these organizations from the north of
Mali is likely to lead to a bloody
campaign throughout the country, and possibly beyond. France ’s entry into the fighting in
Mali may expand or may even,
despite their reservations, involve other NATO member countries in a long and
bloody military campaign such as the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan , which featured involvement by the
United States and its allies,
including France . Along with support for
Algeria from major Western countries, particularly the United States and Great
Britain, for refusing to surrender to terror, and even before the full details
of the operation were known, the deadly results of the hostage-taking incident
led to international criticism over the way in which the hostage rescue was
handled.
It remains an open question whether
Algeria’s tough stance toward the terrorist attack will prevent similar
incidents in the future, or whether, along with the fighting developing in Mali,
it will actually open a Pandora’s box in the region that could spill over into
Europe as well and result in reprisals by al-Qaeda in the Maghreb and its
partners in global jihad. Furthermore, the fighting by global jihadist elements
in the border areas of states with a problem of governance and large Muslim
populations offers a lifeline for the battered organization of Ayman
al-Zawahiri, the current leader of al-Qaeda, and a source of rejuvenation for
the global jihadist camp. Therefore, al-Qaeda’s leader will likely seek to
exploit the events in Algeria
and Mali to fish in these troubled waters
and encourage his affiliates to wage jihad to defend the occupied lands of Islam
while removing the local rulers who collaborate with their Western crusader
patrons.
Font: Yoram Schweitzer is a senior research fellow and head of the program on Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict at INSS. Olga Bogorad is an intern in the program, and
[1] These were the figures publicly released at the time
of this writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment